Who actually says “super intelligence”?
Since the September 29 order, 1 of the 8 AI leaders has switched and 5 of the 14 agencies we check have renamed their AI pages, yet 0 of 14 agency documents in the Federal Register use the term.
The order told federal agencies to stop saying “artificial intelligence.” We count who follows, in their own words, and take no side on whether they should.
Each company scores 0 to 100 by its strongest use of the term in its own words, from 20 for an executive mention to 100 for a company-wide rename, and the company meters show the average. The SEC meter shows the share of filings that use the new term, and the federal meter how many of the agencies we check by hand have renamed their AI pages. How we count
We don't care which word wins
Most other trackers of the rename are run by people who sell domains or hold a token tied to the term. One of them counts every news outlet that prints the phrase as an adopter, critics included. Numbers built that way run high.
- Own words only. A company’s status rests on its newsroom, its SEC filings, its official accounts and its products. News stories help us find leads. They never count as proof.
- A mention isn’t adoption. Quoting the order, or naming the renamed federal office, doesn’t count as using the term.
- Every number has a source. Each status links to the post or filing behind it, and the data is free to download.
- No stake. We sell no domains or tokens. Sponsors are labeled and never touch the numbers.
The newest uses of the term
Newest uses
6Status changes
4- Still says AI to Partly, score 0 to 20
- Still says AI to Partly, score 0 to 20
- Silent to Still says AI
- Still says AI to Partly to Still says AI, reversed the same day
One email each morning
Who switched, what they published and what the filings say. No spin.